GRESB references are to the 2026 Real Estate Assessment; check the GRESB guides for the current year's indicators and dates. ESG property management starts the day the owner's asset manager sends an email asking for "the GRESB data" by the end of the month. What arrives is a spreadsheet with tabs for energy, greenhouse gas, water, waste, certifications and tenant engagement, each asking for twelve months of figures by building, split by landlord-controlled and tenant-controlled areas, with a column for data coverage. The operator who has never been asked before discovers that the numbers exist, but in four places: the utility bills in accounts payable, the tenant meter reads in the billing system, the waste contractor's monthly report in someone's inbox, and the certifications in a folder from the last refinancing. ESG for a property manager is a data-collection problem before it is anything else. Policies, targets and certifications come later and are mostly the owner's job. The ...
When the marketing budget comes down by a fifth, the usual method is quick and feels rigorous. Sort channels by cost per lead. Cut from the bottom. That method answers a question nobody asked. It tells you which channels were present when leads arrived. It cannot tell you which channels caused them, and those are different things with different consequences. The distinction has a name. The first is attribution. The second is incrementality. Your lead source report primarily tells you where credit was assigned. A budget decision asks a different question: what would happen if you changed or removed the channel? Present is not the same as responsible Attribution tells you who was in the room. Incrementality tells you what would have happened if they had not been. A channel can appear on thousands of lead records and contribute almost nothing, because those renters would have found you anyway. Another can appear on few records and still contribute earlier in the decision process, without ...
"Fee transparency" is being used to describe three different obligations. One is about the advertised price: what number a listing has to show. One is about the lease document: what has to be itemized, and where. And one is about the fee itself: whether a particular charge can be made at all. A state can do one of these without the others. The same fee can be lawful to charge, lawful to advertise separately in one state, and required to be folded into a single total price in another. And since March 2026, there is a federal track as well. It is not a rule. But it shows what practices and industry issues the FTC is currently examining, and it names property management software as part of the picture. The Federal Position: A Question, Not A Rule On 13 March 2026, the Federal Trade Commission published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Rental Housing Fee Practices, at 91 FR 12325. Comments closed on 13 April 2026. An ANPRM is the first stage of ...
Most property management operations already issue work orders. A tenant reports a leak, a work order goes to a plumber, the plumber fixes it and sends an invoice. The question of purchase orders usually arrives from finance: shouldn't we be raising POs? The honest answer is sometimes, for some spend, and not as a blanket rule. A PO added to every small call-out can create paperwork without adding meaningful control. A PO missing from a $40,000 roof project leaves the most important number in the job unrecorded. The useful question is not whether to use POs. It is which spend needs one. What Each Document Does They look similar and do different jobs. Work order Purchase order What it records An instruction to do work An authorised purchase, including price and terms Who it mainly serves The property team and the vendor Finance and the approver Key content Location, problem, access, priority Scope, price, terms, approval Answers What needs doing, where, by when What was agreed to ...
Here is one renter who signed a lease at one of your properties last month, and everything she did beforehand. Day What happened Tracked? 1 Scrolled past your sponsored post on social media. Did not click No 4 Googled "2 bed apartments near [neighborhood]," clicked your property website, looked at floor plans, left Partly 6 Found the same property on a listing portal and saved it to her shortlist By the portal 11 Clicked a paid search ad and filled in a guest card on your website Yes 12 Answered a call from your leasing agent and booked a tour Yes 15 Toured in person Yes 19 Applied and signed Yes Nineteen days, seven touchpoints, four channels. One lease. Now a simple question with a surprisingly contested answer: which channel produced it? Four models, four right answers First touch gives the credit to the first tracked interaction. The social impression was never captured, because she did not click, so organic search becomes the first tracked touch. Last touch says paid search, ...
An AP aging report shows how long unpaid bills have been outstanding: current, 30 days, 60, 90 and beyond. In a business that owns all its properties, it is primarily a view of the business's outstanding supplier obligations and how long they have been unpaid. In property management, the same report leaves out a more complicated picture. A bill can sit at 60 days because the owner's balance cannot cover it, because the owner has not approved it, because the vendor has not supplied the paperwork, or because the work is in dispute. None of those is about the management company's own cash, and each needs a different person to act. An aging report that shows only how old a bill is cannot tell you which. This covers what to add so it can. The Standard Report The familiar layout groups unpaid invoices by vendor across five columns: current, 1 to 30 days, 31 to 60 days, 61 to 90 days, and over 90 days. Useful, and incomplete for this purpose in two ways. It shows age but not cause. A 60-day ...
September 2026 , Written for landlords and managing agents in the UK, with notes where US practice differs. Sample wording is illustrative and should be reviewed by the parties' solicitors before use. Green lease clauses are the provisions in a commercial lease that make the landlord and the tenant cooperate on how the building uses energy, water and materials: who shares which data with whom, what the tenant may and may not do to the building's systems, what standard any works must meet, who pays for efficiency improvements, and how the two sides meet to review it all. Ten years ago they were a badge for a handful of institutional landlords. Now they are the mechanism by which a landlord gets the whole-building energy data that Local Law 97, BERDO, GRESB and every investor questionnaire ask for, and by which a UK landlord gets access to a let building to do the works the 2031 EPC B standard will require. This guide is a clause library. It sets out what a green lease is, the five ...
"Fee transparency" is being used to describe three different obligations. One is about the advertised price: what number a listing has to show. One is about the lease document: what has to be itemized, and where. And one is about the fee itself: whether a particular charge can be made at all. A state can do one of these without the others. The same fee can be lawful to charge, lawful to advertise separately in one state, and required to be folded into a single total price in another. And since March 2026, there is a federal track as well. It is not a rule. But it shows what practices and industry issues the FTC is currently examining, and it names property management software as part of the picture. The Federal Position: A Question, Not A Rule On 13 March 2026, the Federal Trade Commission published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Rental Housing Fee Practices, at 91 FR 12325. Comments closed on 13 April 2026. An ANPRM is the first stage of ...
A landscaper sends one invoice for $1,800 covering three properties. Pest control bills a monthly contract across a portfolio. A single insurance premium covers several buildings. In a business that owns all its properties, splitting that invoice is a reporting question. It affects which property's P&L carries the cost. In property management it is a different kind of question. If those three properties belong to three different owners, the split decides whose money pays for what. Get it wrong and one owner has paid for work on another owner's property, from funds you hold for them. This covers the two kinds of shared invoice, the allocation methods that hold up, a worked example, and what to keep so the split can be explained later. Two Kinds of Shared Invoice They look alike on arrival and need different handling. Attributable costs. The invoice covers separate work at separate properties that happens to be billed together. Three lawns mown, three call-outs, three service ...